Fat vs carb burning – a N=1 chart

I have read one of Jamie’s even-more-excellent-than-usual posts, and in the comments, another post was linked that provided some interesting N=1 data. I played with it and got a nice chart showing how much carbs and fat are burned during exercise, as a function of the exercise intensity.

I graphed the energy consumption by source (fat, carbs) against the total energy consumption, both measured as a percentage of max energy consumption (which would probably close enough to the VO2max). The graphs are stacked on top of the other (carbs on top in red, fat is blue) so evidently the overall shape is a triangle:

What do we see? We start out with a 1/3 carbs, 2/3 fat mix at rest (note: rest is at about 5% of the max). I needed to posit the carb consumption. The data suggests 0, but it is well known that the brain runs on carbs, so I added this as a baseline of 150g/day (0.1g/min). Then up to about 25%, the incremental energy need is fully supplied by the fat metabolism (remember, N=1), and then it stays at this level until about 80%, with all additional energy provided by carbs. Above 80%, fat metabolism goes down, as then oxygen becomes a binding constraint, and fat needs more oxygen per unit of ATP produced.From 95% onwards, 100% of the energy comes from carbs.

Conclusion: there is no point exercising at more than 25-30% of your max if you want to burn fat – the remainder comes from carbs (or worse, muscle proteins if fasting). And remember, this is N=1, in case I havent said this.

Here is the original chart:

And here is the raw data (pre adjustment for brain carbs):

kcal/min %max fat g/min %fat carb g/min %carb
1 6% 0.11 95% 0.01 5%
2 12% 0.22 100% 0 0%
3 18% 0.33 100% 0 0%
4 24% 0.44 99% 0.01 1%
5 29% 0.27 48% 0.69 52%
6 35% 0.41 62% 0.61 38%
7 41% 0.45 58% 0.78 42%
8 47% 0.41 46% 1.15 54%
9 53% 0.53 42% 1.39 58%
10 59% 0.49 44% 1.49 56%
11 65% 0.46 38% 1.82 62%
12 71% 0.55 41% 1.89 59%
13 76% 0.53 37% 2.18 63%
14 82% 0.47 30% 2.61 70%
15 88% 0.23 14% 3.44 86%
16 94% 0 0% 4.27 100%
17 100% 0 0% 4.53 100%

4 thoughts on “Fat vs carb burning – a N=1 chart

    • Thanks. One thing I want to ask Jamie about was whether he thinks that the fat-usage threshold can be moved (ie the 25-ish-percent). He always talks about being fat-adapted, and this is really what this should be: the first kink is moved diagonally up to the right, the horizontal stretch moves accordingly, and the other kink probably moves up-and-left rather than staying at 80%, but I have to run some number to look at this in detail.

      • I agree that increasing fitness and/or fat-adaption moves the first kink diagonally up to the right. I have no idea what happens to the second kink. I think that increasing fitness and/or fat-adaption moves the point at which fat-burning falls to zero slightly to the right.

        Elite marathon runners have minimised their carb consumption to make their limited glycogen stores last as long as possible.

  1. Дробления щебня производится в несколько этапов с целью получения различных фракций щебня. Для первого этапа дробления щебня используются щековые дробильные установки. Механизм их следующий: в них загружается исходная горная порода, которая подвергается воздействию двух дробильных плит («щек»); одна плита остается неподвижной, вторая же попеременно приближается или отдаляется от первой под действием привода. Таким образом, между дробильными плитами образуется гранитный щебень характеристики клинообразное пространство. Горные породы в большинстве своем имеют кристаллическое строение, соответственно, дробление происходит по месту соединения кристаллов. Щековые дробильные установки выдают на выходе крупные зерна щебня, в большинстве своем неправильной формы.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s